Let Men Exploit Men

Let Men Exploit Men: A Misandrist, Radical Feminist Case for the Rise of Trans Porn

By Ximena Rodríguez-López

New York, NY - After the overwhelmingly positive response to my recent article on male castration — especially from radical feminist circles — it’s clear there is an urgent need for more unapologetically misandrist, reality-based discourse on the nature of male sexuality. Across conversations, research threads, and firsthand testimonies, one fact remains indisputable: male sexual desire is not only uncontainable in its raw form — it is structurally predatory, historically consistent, and increasingly unhinged under digital capitalism. Women, girls, and the socially feminized have always borne the brunt. But now, as the male libido devours itself online, the tide may be turning. 

To be clear, this is not about the kind of content that made Buck Angel a recognizable figure in early alt-porn circles. That was a different paradigm — one centered around female-to-male transitions and often aimed at queer audiences. What we’re discussing here is the mainstream surge in pornography where men — overwhelmingly straight-identified — are aroused by other men who have adopted hyper-feminized aesthetics: surgically enhanced breasts, exaggerated makeup, submissive posturing. This is not gender exploration because the concept of "gender" is not real. This is the male gaze consuming itself. And as a committed misandrist, I see in this a grim kind of justice that should be celebrated. 

The trans-identified male, by entering porn, has not escaped male domination — he has entered its most exploitative arena. His body becomes yet another canvas for male perversion, one that will be fetishized, degraded, and discarded by the same compulsive consumers who reduce women to digital commodities. His future — like that of so many female performers before him — will be dictated by the whims of men who watch anonymously, masturbate compulsively, and toss him coins through OnlyFans and cam sites in exchange for ever more extreme performances. If there is anything to celebrate, it is that — finally — men are turning their predatory appetites on each other.

Recent data indicates a sharp rise in the consumption of trans porn by young, self-identified "straight men" — a phenomenon that is neither niche nor accidental. According to Pornhub’s 2023 Year in Review, “Transgender” remained one of the platform’s most searched categories globally, and it ranked #1 in countries like Brazil and the Philippines, while consistently appearing in the top 10 in the United States. Notably, over 75% of users who viewed trans porn on major sites identified as straight men. 

This is not a contradiction — it is a function of the porn algorithm. A 2021 study published in Frontiers in Psychology found that straight men who frequently consume pornography are more likely to seek novel, extreme, or taboo content over time, with trans porn acting as a common escalation category. These viewers are not engaging with gender diversity — they are seeking the combination of familiarity and taboo: feminized presentation plus the presence of a penis. It satisfies a compulsion that regular heterosexual content no longer stimulates. The algorithms don’t “turn” straight men trans-curious; they track patterns of tolerance and novelty-seeking, ultimately pushing users toward whatever retains attention. And increasingly, for young men — especially those raised on endless digital stimulation — that includes content they once found unthinkable. This isn’t about identity. It’s about addiction.

What many liberal defenders of male sexuality fail to address is its continuity across civilizations. Male lust, when unregulated, has repeatedly evolved into institutionalized abuse. This isn’t hyperbole — it is thoroughly documented history.

In Ancient Greece, pederasty — the sanctioned sexual mentorship of adolescent boys by adult men — was not a fringe behavior. It was embedded in the education system. Philosophers such as Plato and Xenophon wrote of these relationships as if they were spiritual, or noble. In reality, they were coercive systems that blurred the line between mentorship and molestation. I can argue for certain that the hatred of women stemmed from these early times in history. 

In Imperial Rome, sexual access was a marker of power. Male citizens were permitted — even encouraged — to sexually dominate not only women but also male slaves and children. A man’s status was not diminished by whom he penetrated, only by being penetrated. It was not about orientation. It was about power. As the Lex Scantinia shows, prohibitions existed not to protect the vulnerable, but to protect Roman male dignity.

In medieval and early modern Europe, noble households and royal courts were rife with sexual exploitation. The concept of “the first night” (jus primae noctis), whether myth or selectively enforced practice, reflects the persistent belief that male rulers had sexual rights over women under their control. Church records show a long trail of priests and monks caught in acts of molestation, particularly of choir boys — a pattern that would later become institutionalized in global Catholic scandals centuries later.

The Enlightenment and Victorian periods, often mischaracterized as times of prudish sexual restraint, were in fact saturated with child prostitution, incest, and marital rape — the last of which remained legal in many Western nations well into the 20th century. In London’s 19th-century brothel economy, it was not uncommon for girls as young as 10 to be sold for sex. Charles Dickens and others wrote bitterly of this underground economy, but little was done.

The industrialization of sex accelerated in the 20th century with the birth of commercial pornography, brothels in wartime, and post-war suburban sex markets — and now, we see its final form: algorithmically optimized perversion with no ceiling.
The idea that some women are “safe” from male perversion — mothers, daughters, sisters — is a myth. Porn search data shows incest-themed content has surged in popularity in the last decade. The most commonly searched terms on major porn platforms consistently include “stepdaughter,” “teen,” and “sister.” Even “mother-son” content has entered the mainstream, reflecting a porn culture entirely unconcerned with taboos that previously held male desires in check.

Psychological studies of male sexual fantasy reveal the disturbing overlap between taboo-breaking and arousal. One 2014 study from the University of Montreal found that 90% of men admitted to watching porn featuring acts they would never consent to in real life — including rape, coercion, and incest. It’s not that they’re unaware. It’s that they enjoy the crossing of boundaries.

And this doesn’t stop at fantasy. Reports from child protection organizations confirm that the vast majority of sexual abuse against minors is perpetrated by men — often family members. Uncles, cousins, brothers, and yes, even fathers. The grooming of girl children within their own homes is not a rare horror — it is a chronic societal pattern. Child sexual abuse remains one of the most underreported crimes globally, with victims frequently silenced or disbelieved, especially when the abuser is a patriarchal figure.

What was once the bathhouse has become the browser. Porn algorithms now replicate — and accelerate — the male pattern: desensitization, novelty-seeking, and escalation. A 2021 study published in The Journal of Sex Research confirmed that frequent porn users experience a consistent need for more extreme content over time, a feedback loop driven by dopamine tolerance and novelty addiction.

The trajectory is nearly predictable:
	•	Phase 1: “Vanilla” heterosexual sex
	•	Phase 2: Rough sex, choking, slapping
	•	Phase 3: Gangbangs, humiliation, non-consensual roleplay
	•	Phase 4: Incest-themed content, age regression
	•	Phase 5: Trans porn, sissy hypno, forced feminization
	•	Phase 6: Child exploitation imagery — real or simulated

This progression isn’t speculative — it is mapped in data, in user behavior, in click patterns. The porn industry itself knows this. Platforms optimize for escalation because escalation drives engagement. A user who’s bored by “vanilla” scenes is a user who’ll stay longer if given something harder, faster, and more taboo.

Trans-identified males in porn now occupy the final phase of this escalation. They are not part of some utopian sexual diversity. They are part of a system that has so fully consumed and commodified women that it now turns inward, fetishizing the feminized male body as a last-ditch effort to get aroused.

These aren’t men “exploring gender.” These are men projecting fantasies of submission, degradation, and control onto male bodies — bodies that simultaneously resemble women but allow for punishment without guilt. Many of these performers, by their own accounts, arrived at trans identity not via introspection but through compulsive pornography consumption.

Male sexuality has always moved outward — into conquest, possession, and domination. But with the digitization of lust, men are now circling themselves. Porn addiction rates are rising. Erectile dysfunction in young men is increasing. Real relationships are being replaced by parasocial and simulated interactions. And in the darkest corners of the internet, what follows after trans fetish porn is the sexualization of children — the last boundary.

Not always real children — though child sexual abuse material is a growing crisis — but adult performers mimicking children, schoolgirl scenarios, infantilization, pacifiers, and diapers, “age play.” Pornhub removed thousands of these videos only after being threatened with federal investigations. The demand has not gone away. There is no reforming male lust. History shows us this. Psychiatry has confirmed it. Algorithmic patterns prove it. Every new medium — theater, film, photography, the internet — becomes, first and foremost, a conduit for male sexual desire. Not connection. Not intimacy. But consumption.

So if the final stage of that consumption is men fetishizing each other, destroying each other, spiraling inward in search of a thrill that no longer exists — let it happen. Let them disappear into their own sickness. Let the algorithm, the market, and the porn machine devour them. Because the alternative has always been women. It has always been girls. This time, let it be the male beasts who pay the price.