women trashing each other

11 Years Later—How Internal Conflicts and Divisive Dynamics Undermine the Solidarity Radical Feminism Needs to Thrive

By TSR

Jill Filipovic’s article, The Tragic Irony of Feminists Trashing Each Other, published over a decade ago, remains disturbingly relevant today. Her incisive critique of internal divisions within feminist communities highlighted how online spaces meant to foster solidarity often devolve into arenas of conflict. Eleven years later, it’s disheartening to see that these patterns not only persist but, in many ways, have worsened in the era of pervasive social media and instant communication.

Filipovic’s piece eloquently pointed out how feminists, instead of building bridges and uniting against systemic misogyny, often turn their energy against one another over ideological differences, tone, or perceived missteps. This behavior undermines the collective power necessary to challenge patriarchal structures. Today, these same dynamics play out on Twitter threads, Facebook groups, Reddit forums, and other platforms. The immediacy and anonymity of online communication amplify misunderstandings and escalate conflicts in ways Filipovic could only have begun to predict.

One major issue is the polarization within radical feminist communities, where purity politics and rigid ideological gatekeeping reign supreme. Instead of engaging in constructive dialogue or fostering mutual understanding, many fall into the trap of canceling, shaming, or ostracizing others who don’t conform to a specific orthodoxy. The tragic irony, as Filipovic noted, is that these actions often mirror the very patriarchal tactics feminists seek to dismantle: silencing dissent, punishing perceived transgressions, and enforcing strict hierarchies.

Additionally, the rise of platforms with algorithms designed to reward outrage and sensationalism has exacerbated these divisions. Nuance and empathy, which are critical for meaningful feminist discourse, often take a backseat to performative displays of moral superiority. Instead of being welcomed and supported, women are met with hostility. This reinforces the very systems of oppression that feminism seeks to dismantle and further alienates those who should feel empowered by the movement.

A particularly troubling consequence of this culture is that many women have begun turning away from radical feminism altogether, disillusioned by what they perceive as cattiness and judgmental behavior. The very spaces that should foster growth and empowerment instead become toxic, driving away those who might otherwise contribute meaningfully to the cause. 

Eleven years after Filipovic’s original critique, it’s clear that the feminist movement must confront these internal fractures if it hopes to sustain itself and effect meaningful change. This doesn’t mean abandoning accountability or critical self-reflection—both are essential for growth—but rather fostering a culture where these processes are rooted in compassion and a shared commitment to liberation.